INGLIZ ANTROPONIMLARINING KELIB CHIQISH TARIXI
This article analyzes the developmental processes of English anthroponyms from a historical perspective. It reflects the characteristics of their conditional periodization based on structural-semantic, cultural, historical, and conceptual apekts.
1. Бегматов Э. Антропономика узбекского язика: Автореф.дис…кан. фил.наук. – Ташкент, 1965. – 26 c.
2. Рыбакин А.И. Словарь английских личных имен: 4000 имен. Изд. 3-е, испр. – М.: Астрель; АСТ, 2000. – 224 с.
3. Stewart, G.R. American Given Names: their Origin & History in the Context of the English Language. - New York. Oxford University Press, 1999. - 264 p.
4. Joseph H. Language Universals: With Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton & Co. 1966.
5. Russell B. On Denoting. Mind (scientific journal) Vol. 14, No. 56., Oxford University Press., pp. 479–493.
6. Christophersen. P., A Linguistic Theory of Translation. Oxford University Press., 1965. -108 p.
7. Gardiner, A. The Theory of Proper Names. A Controversial Essay [Text] / A. Gardiner. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1954. - 78 p.
8. Potts, C.A. Dictionary of Bible Proper Names. - NY.: The Abingdon Press, 1922. - 279 p.
9. Vositov V.A. Study of Language Contacts by Linguists. Journal of Pedagogical Inventions and Practices, 2022., 9, 174–177.
Copyright (c) 2025 «ACTA NUUz»
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
1.png)
