CHINGIZXONNING HARBIY DIPLOMATIYASI: SIYOSIY REALIZM NAZARIYASI DOIRASIDA TAHLIL
This article analyzes Genghis Khan’s military campaigns through the lens of Realpolitik. Genghis Khan avoided ideological claims and directed his military actions toward strategic interests. His campaigns against Kuchluk serve as a clear example of this approach, as he justified his actions through regional stability and legitimacy. The study examines his political pragmatism and military strategy based on historical sources and modern international relations theories.
1. Hans J. Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations (1948), 3, 4, 5, 11, 13.
2. Morgenthau H. J. & K. W. Thompson, Politics Among Nations, Brief Edition (1993), 4, 10.
3. Onon U., The Secret History of the Mongols (2021), 95-97.
4. Ratchnevsky P., Genghis Khan: His Conquests, His Empire, His Legacy (1991), 52-57, 197, 198.
5. Waltz K. N., Theory of International Politics (1979), 112, 115.
6. Barfield R., The Perilous Frontier (1989), 198.
7. Biran M., The Empire of the Qara Khitai (2005), 138.
8. Ибн аль-Асир, Аль-Камиль фи ат-Тарих (2005), 346, 359.
9. Lane G., Daily Life in the Mongol Empire (2004), 140.
10. Al-Bat.īt.ī, Ahwāl H. mulūk al-tatār (2015), 70.
11. Jūzjānī M., Tabaqāt-i Nasirī (1964), 100. A. Juvaini, The History of the World-Conqueror (1958), 67.
12. San R. Germano, Chronica (1934), 2.
13. Jackson P., The Mongols and the Faith of the Conquered (2005), 257.
14. Jagchid S., Chinese Buddhism and Taoism during Mongol Rule (1980), 63.
15. ан-Насавий Ш., Сират ас-Султан Джалал ад-Дин (1996), 7.
16. McLynn F., Genghis Khan: His Conquests, His Empire, His Legacy (2015), 269.
17. Ch’ang Ch’un, The Travels of an Alchemist (1931), 85.
Copyright (c) 2025 News of the NUUz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
1.png)
