ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR READING AND WRITING SKILLS IN TEACHING EFL TO ECONOMICS STUDENTS: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE ON UZBEKISTAN AND INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS
This paper investigates the assessment of English reading and writing skills among economics students in Uzbekistan in comparison with global standards. It examines key evaluation tools, pedagogical approaches, and assessment methods in both contexts. The findings reveal significant differences in evaluation techniques and their influence on students' academic and professional development. The study underscores the necessity for a more standardized evaluation approach to enhance students’ language proficiency in an increasingly competitive global landscape
1. Doniyorova, G. Sh. (2021). Improving the teaching of economic English to university students. Oriental Renaissance: Innovative, Educational, Natural, and Social Sciences, 1(3), 576-580. Available at: oriens.uz
2. Kasimova, M. A. (2024). Enhancing student engagement in foreign language learning through artificial intelligence. Foreign Languages in Uzbekistan, 10(1), 142-156. Available at: journal.fledu.uz
3. Kholmanova, Z. T. (2019). Computational Linguistics. Tashkent: Alisher Navoi Tashkent State University of Uzbek Language and Literature. Available at: tsuull.uz
4. Zikriyoev, A. (2020). Economies of Foreign Countries. Tashkent: Tashkent State University of Economics. Available at: researchgate.net
5. Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2021). On further improving measures for the promotion of foreign language learning. Lex.uz. Available at: lex.uz
6. Department of Foreign Languages. (2021). Tashkent State University of Law. Available at: tsul.uz
7. Hyland, K. (2016). Academic Publishing: Issues and Challenges in the Construction of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2019). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices (3rd ed.). New York: Pearson Education.
10. European Commission. (2022). Education and Training Monitor 2022. Brussels: European Union.
11. British Council. (2019). The State of English in Higher Education in Turkey. London: British Council.
12. Smith, R., & Jones, M. (2021). Aligning language assessment with international standards: A comparative study. Journal of Language Testing and Assessment, 38(2), 123-140.
13. Global Employability Survey. (2021). The Employability Skills Employers Are Looking For. London: Times Higher Education.
14. Karimov, B., Tursunova, D., & Rahimov, A. (2021). Educational reforms in Uzbekistan: Aligning with international language assessment standards. Central Asian Journal of Education, 26(4), 45-60.
15. Tursunova, D., & Rahimov, A. (2022). Challenges in implementing CEFR in Uzbekistan’s higher education. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 10(1), 77-89.
Copyright (c) 2025 ACTA NUUz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
1.png)
