"EXPLORING LINGUISTIC MARKERS OF GENDER: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS"
This article examines the linguistic choices and vocabulary utilized by different genders during instructional activities. It discusses the findings of prior research and analyses, focusing specifically on a case study conducted in Uzbekistan, utilizing survey results to highlight the distinctions between genders based on perspectives and insights gathered from various respondents.
1. Centra, J. A., & Gaubatz, N. B. (1998). Is there gender bias in student ratings of instruction? Journal of Higher Education, 70, 17-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2000.11780814
2. Francis, B., Skelton, C., Carrington, B., Hutchings, M., Read B., & Hall I. (2006). A Perfect Match? Pupils’ and teachers’ views of the impact of matching educators and learners by gender. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Warwick, 6-9 September 2006.
3. Кубрякова Е.С. Начальные этапы становления когнитивизма: лингвистика, психология, когнитивная наука//Вопросы языкознания. – 1994. – № 4. – p. 34-47
4. “The structure of scientific revolutions” by Thomas Kuhn, p. 5-6
5. Ashurova D.U. Cognitive Stylistics: views, approaches, perspectives//Stylistics in the light of modern linguistic trends. Papers of scientific practical conference. – Tashkent, 2011. – P. 10-12
6. Степанов Ю. С. В трёхмерном пространстве языка. – М.: Наука, 1985. – 336 p.
7. Lim, J., & Meer, J. (2017). The Impact of Teacher-Student Gender Matches, Random Assignment Evidence from South Korea. Journal of Human Resources, 52(4), 979-997. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.52.4.1215-7585R1
8. Basow, S. A. (1999). Student evaluations of college professors: When gender matters. Journal of Educational Psychology 87(4), 656-65. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.4.656
9. Gollifer, Sue, and Siobhan Gorman. ‘Gender Mainstreaming in Higher Education Toolkit’. Accessed 12 November 2020. https://www.inasp.info/gendertoolkit.
10. Leowinata, Sevilla, and Sibyl Frei. ‘Gender Mainstreaming Toolkit for Teachers and Teacher Educators’. Commonwealth of Learning, n.d., 190. https://doi.org/ISBN 978-1-894975-68-1
11. GES (2018). The Gender Handbook for Teaching Practice Mentors: A Guide for Implementing Gender Responsive Pedagogy, Policies and Practices during Teaching Practice. Accra: GES.
12. Lenz Taguchi, H. (2005). Getting Personal: How Early Childhood Teacher Education Troubles Students’ and Teacher Educators’ Identities Regarding Subjectivity and Feminism. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 6, 244-255. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2005.6.3.5
14. https://cpercy.artsci.utoronto.ca/courses/6362-gregoire.htm
16. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/paradigm
17. Jespersen, O. (1922). Language, its nature, development and origin. London: George Allen & Unwin.
18. Tannen, D. (1990b). Sex, lies and conversation. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www. washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1990/06/24/sex-lies-and -conversation/01cb17ba-1af7-4bf4- 8a02-3d1b6c11648f/
19. Troia, G. A., Harbaugh, A. G., Shankland, R. K., Wolbers, K. A., & Lawrence, A. M. (2013). Relationships between writing motivation, writing activity, and writing performance: Effects of grade, sex, and ability. Reading and Writing, 26(1), 17–44. doi:10.100711145-012-9379-2
20. Longobardi, E., Spataro, P., Frigerio, A., & Rescorla, L. (2016). Gender differences in the relationship between language and social competence in preschool children. Infant Behavior and Development, 43, 1–4. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.03.001 PMID:26974894
21. Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and women’s place. Harper & Row.
Copyright (c) 2025 «ACTA NUUz»
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
1.png)
