SPECIFIC FEATURES OF WESTERN AND EASTERN SECURITY ARCHITECTURE
This comparative analysis delves into the intricate differences in security architecture between Western and Eastern nations, specifically examining the strategic priorities and regional dynamics of the USA, Germany, France, UK, India, China, South Korea. The exploration encompasses factors such as geopolitical alignments, defense strategies, regional conflicts, and military capabilities, unraveling a complex interplay that shapes their security frameworks. Highlighting the Western emphasis on collective defense, NATO alliances, and
counterterrorism initiatives, the study contrasts this with the Eastern focus on regional stability, territorial disputes, and strategic partnerships. Ultimately, this comprehensive examination provides valuable insights into the multifaceted security landscape across these diverse nations, offering a deeper understanding of the specific features that characterize Western and Eastern security architectures.
Douglas T. Stuart. (2003). “Ministry of Fear: The 1947 National Security Act in Historical and Institutional Context.” International
Studies Perspectives. Oxford University Press. Vol 4. No 3. P:296.
THE NATIONAL SECURITY ACT OF 1947, Title II – The Department of Defense [National Military Establishment]. Sec.201.
Nelson, A. K.(1985). “President Truman and the Evolution of the National Security Council.” The Journal of American History,
Vol.72, No.2, pp:360–378.
Tidd, J. M. (2008). “From Revolution to Reform: A Brief History of U.S. Intelligence.” The SAIS Review of International Affairs,
Vol 28, No 1, pp:5–24.
Walker, Douglas H. (2011). “Necessary to the Security of a Free State: Federalism and the Original Meaning of the Second
Amendment”, pp:41-47.
“Robust. Resilient. Sustainable. Integrated Security for Germany. National Security Strategy”. (2023). Federal Foreign Office,
pp:11-73.
“National strategic review”. (2022). Secrétariat Général de la Défense Et de la Sécurité Nationale, pp:7-51.
“France’s New Security Strategy: More Leadership in the EU?” Friedrich Naumann Foundation, 2022.
“The National Security Strategy of the United Kingdom: Security in an interdependent world”, March 2008, pp:6-9.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7c68abed915d696ccfc92a/7291.pdf
Pratyush Ranjan (2016). “Who is India’s NSA Ajit Doval and what is the ‘Doval Doctrine’?” News Nation English.
Sheena Chestnut Greitens. (2023). “National Security after China’s 20th Party Congress: Trends in Discourse and Policy.” China
Leadership Monitor.
Chung Min Lee. (2022). “Korea Net Assessment 2022: Shoring Up South Korea’s National Security Apparatus.” Carnegie
Endowment for International Peace.
Radjabov, S. (2023). The Significance of the Means of Cyberspace in the Transformation of Aesthetic Needs. CENTRAL ASIAN
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HISTORY, 4(12), 73-78.
Rajabov, S. S. (2021). The harmony of the aesthetic needs of the individual in cyberspace with the philosophy of
sophistication. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 11(11), 210-213.
Ashuraliyevna, M. L., Salihovna, K. D., Shuhratovna, A. N., Ilhamovich, T. A., Sheraliyevich, R. S., & Komilovich, A. S. (2019).
Formation of cyber space, protecting youth from the danger of cyber extremism. International Journal of Recent Technology and
Engineering, 8(2), S4
RSKHULOVA, D., KOSIMOVA, F., & MUTALOVA, S. (2024). LINGVISTIKA UNIVERSITETLARDA TILI O'ZLASHTIRISHNING XUSUSIYATLARI VA YO'RIQNOMA MASALALARI. News of the NUUz, 1(1.7. 1), 158-160.
RUZIKULOVA, N. (2024). BOSHLANG ‘ICH SINF O ‘QUVCHILARIDA XALQ OG ‘ZAKI IJODI JANRLARINI INNOVASION O ‘QITISHNI TAKOMILLASHTIRISH YO ‘LLARI. News of the NUUz, 1(1.7. 1), 161-165.
SAIDAZIMKHUJAEVA, M. (2024). FRANSIYA TASHQI SIYOSATIDA “YUMSHOQ KUCH”. News of the NUUz, 1(1.7. 1), 166-169.
.jpg)
1.png)
