ON THE STUDY OF JUDICAL SPEECH

judicial eloquence, court proceedings, court session, structure of judicial discourse, active and passive speech.

Authors

Researches to comprehensively enhance judicial practice pose crucial tasks not only for lawyers but also for linguists. Alongside this, developing judicial linguistics as a separate field, achieving linguistic competence in legal practice, and ensuring that language is understandable and fluent, meeting the demands of legal language are all pressing needs. In this context, the article justifies the necessity of distinguishing perspectives on judicial discourse, particularly the need to differentiate court proceedings and court sessions as separate speech situations. It also outlines the analysis of existing research on defining the structure of judicial discourse, specifically regarding the classification of active and passive speech, and provides commentary and perspectives on these studies