Development of a Model Based on the Ordinary Kriging Method for Surface Modeling and Reconstruction from Data Given at Scattered Nodess
This paper studies mathematical equations that can be used to reconstruct and
analyze geological surfaces using the data provided at a point (scattered points). The work explains
the working capabilities of the kriging technique in the reconstruction of surfaces, what the term
signifies as a mathematical model, and how the technique is used in the computing process. The
implementation of kriging method in the circumstances of irregularly spaced points of the space is
discussed both mathematically and computationally and this example is compared to the case of grid
nodes. The findings have revealed that when the points are not distributed consistently, the kriging
technique has proven to be a natural and sound mathematical framework in the reconstruction of
geological surfaces. This paper is dedicated to the justification of the efficiency of the kriging model
in reconstruction and analysis of geological surfaces.
1. Bakhromov, S. A.; Jumaev, J.; Kobilov, S.; Tukhtasinov, M. Analysis of the Construction of Local
Interpolation Cubic Splines on the Basis of Detailed Data. AIP Conference Proceedings 2781 (2023),
020077.
2. Bakhromov, S. A.; Eshkuvatov, Z. K. Error Estimates for One Local Interpolation Cubic Spline with the
Maximum Approximation Order of O(h 3 ) for W 1 [a,b] Classes. AIP Conference Proceedings 2484 (2023),
030009.
3. Bakhromov, S. A. Digital Processing of Signals Ryabenky Cubic Spline Model. AIP Conference Proceedings
2781 (2023), 020015.
4. Bakhromov, S. Comparative Analysis of Methods for Approximation of Functions by Polynomial Splines.
AIP Conference Proceedings 2781 (2023), 020069.
5. Maiti, P.; Mitra, D. Ordinary kriging interpolation for indoor 3D REM. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz.
Comput. 14 (2023), 13285–13299.
6. Kebede, H.; Demissie, Z.; Tadesse, H.; Eshetu, A. Spatial interpolation techniques comparison and
evaluation: The case of ground-based gravity and elevation datasets of the central Main Ethiopian rift.
Heliyon 10 (2024), e32806.
7. Boumpoulis, V.; Michalopoulou, M.; Depountis, N. Comparison between different spatial interpolation
methods for the development of sediment distribution maps in coastal areas. Earth Sci. Inform. 16 (2023),
2069–2087.
8. Shao, C.; Xu, Y.; Chen, H.; Zheng, S.; Qin, X. Ordinary Kriging Interpolation Method Combined with
FEM for Arch Dam Deformation Field Estimation. Mathematics 11 (2023), 1106.
9. Jang, D.; Kim, B.; Choi, H.; et al. Kriging Interpolation for Constructing Database of the Atmospheric
Refractivity in Korea. Remote Sens. 16 (2024), 2379.
10. Dash, P. K.; et al. Exploring the Effect of Sampling Density on Spatial Interpolation Accuracy. Land 13
(2024), 1615.
11. Maniteja, M.; et al. Advancing Iron Ore Grade Estimation: A Comparative Study of Geo-Statistical and
Machine Learning Interpolation Methods. Minerals 15 (2025), 131.
12. Zhang, J.; et al. Research on a coal seam modeling construction method based on ordinary kriging
interpolation. Sci. Rep. (2024), doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77114-1.
13. Zhang, J.; et al. Comparative Study on Different Interpolation Methods and Their Application in Spatial
Distribution Analysis. Sustainability 16 (2024), 3545.
14. Liu, S.; et al. A combined spatial interpolation method of co-Kriging with machine learning for soil water-
salt distribution evaluation. J. Hydrol. (2025).
Copyright (c) 2026 «ВЕСТНИК НУУз»
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование — На тех же условиях») 4.0 Всемирная.
.jpg)
2.png)
