LINGVISTIK MADANIY KONSEPTLAR VA MADANIYATLARARO TUSHUNCHALAR TAHLILI
##submission.downloads##
Ushbu maqolada lingvistik madaniy konseptlar va madaniyatlararo tushunchalar tahlili mavzusida chuqur o’rganish amalga oshirilgan. Maqola, xususan, "shubha" kabi tushunchalarning semantik noaniqligini va turli madaniyatlarda qanday qo’llanilishini tahlil qiladi. O’zbek va ingliz tillarida ushbu tushunchaning turli ma’nolar va nuanslar bilan qanday ifodalanishi keltirilgan misollar orqali ko’rsatilgan. Lingvistik madaniy konseptlarning xususiyatlari, ularning madaniyatlararo farqlari va o’xshashliklari muhokama qilingan, shuningdek, tilshunoslik va madaniyatshunoslik sohalarining uyg’unlashuvi hamda bu sohalarning tushunchalarni qanday qilib har xil madaniyatlar kontekstida tahlil qilishiga urg;u berilgan
Dilafruz TURAKULOVA. (2024). LINGVISTIK MADANIY KONSEPTLAR VA MADANIYATLARARO TUSHUNCHALAR TAHLILI. «O‘zMU XABARLARI», 1(1.1), 297–300. https://doi.org/10.69617/nuuz.v1i1.1.490
1. Erben Johansson N. et al. The typology of sound symbolism: Defining macro-concepts via their semantic and phonetic features //Linguistic Typology. – 2020. – Т. 24. – №. 2. – С. 253-310.
2. Novikova I. N. et al. Lexical and semantic representation of the linguistic and cultural concept “Rest” in the English, German, and Russian languages //Opción. – 2018. – Т. 34. – №. 85-2. – С. 237-256.
3. Jackson J. C. et al. Emotion semantics show both cultural variation and universal structure //Science. – 2019. – Т. 366. – №. 6472. – С. 1517-1522.
4. Haraway D. J., Goodeve T. N. Race: Universal donors in a vampire culture: It’s all in the family. Biological kinship categories in the twentieth-century United States //Modest_Witness@ Second_Millennium. FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse. – Routledge, 2018. – С. 213-265.
5. Kieran L., Anderson C. Connecting universal design for learning with culturally responsive teaching //Education and Urban Society. – 2019. – Т. 51. – №. 9. – С. 1202-1216.
6. Kurbanova F. K. Language units denoting cultural features of a nation //Academic research in educational sciences. – 2020. – №. 3. – С. 980-984.
7. Baratovna K. D. NON-EQUIVALENT VOCABULARY OF THE RUSSIAN AND UZBEK LANGUAGE //Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal. – 2022. – Т. 10. – №. 4. – С. 682-684.
8. Tursunovich R. I. Linguistic and Cultural Aspects of Literary Translation and Translation Skills //British Journal of Global Ecology and Sustainable Development. – 2022. – Т. 10. – С. 168-173.
2. Novikova I. N. et al. Lexical and semantic representation of the linguistic and cultural concept “Rest” in the English, German, and Russian languages //Opción. – 2018. – Т. 34. – №. 85-2. – С. 237-256.
3. Jackson J. C. et al. Emotion semantics show both cultural variation and universal structure //Science. – 2019. – Т. 366. – №. 6472. – С. 1517-1522.
4. Haraway D. J., Goodeve T. N. Race: Universal donors in a vampire culture: It’s all in the family. Biological kinship categories in the twentieth-century United States //Modest_Witness@ Second_Millennium. FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse. – Routledge, 2018. – С. 213-265.
5. Kieran L., Anderson C. Connecting universal design for learning with culturally responsive teaching //Education and Urban Society. – 2019. – Т. 51. – №. 9. – С. 1202-1216.
6. Kurbanova F. K. Language units denoting cultural features of a nation //Academic research in educational sciences. – 2020. – №. 3. – С. 980-984.
7. Baratovna K. D. NON-EQUIVALENT VOCABULARY OF THE RUSSIAN AND UZBEK LANGUAGE //Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal. – 2022. – Т. 10. – №. 4. – С. 682-684.
8. Tursunovich R. I. Linguistic and Cultural Aspects of Literary Translation and Translation Skills //British Journal of Global Ecology and Sustainable Development. – 2022. – Т. 10. – С. 168-173.
.jpg)
.png)
