ANALYSIS OF LINGUISTIC PRACTICES IN TRANSPORT ANNOUNCEMENTS
Versions
- 18-09-2025 (2)
- 18-09-2025 (1)
This study explores the linguistic variations inherent in transport announcements within English and Uzbek contexts, emphasizing how language reflects cultural nuances and communicative practices in transportation systems. Using a selection of authentic transport announcements from various modes of transit, this research conducts a comprehensive linguistic analysis that examines grammatical structures, lexical choices, and pragmatic considerations unique to each language. The findings reveal significant differences in the use of formal and informal registers, as well as variations in the presentation of information based on cultural expectations. Moreover, the study highlights the implications of these linguistic choices for passenger comprehension and interaction. This comparative analysis of English and Uzbek not only contributes to the understanding of language use in practical situations but also informs future enhancements in the design of multilingual transport announcements aimed at improving communication and accessibility for diverse populations.
1. Lippi-Green, R. (2012). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. Routledge.
2. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford University Press.
3. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis. Sage.
4. Kramsch, Claire (1993). Context and Culture in Language Teaching. Oxford University Press.
5. Christiansen, Henning & Dahl, Veronica. (2005). Meaning in context. In A. Dey, B. Kokinov, D.
6. Prayer, G. & Peter, G (Eds). (2005). Contextualism in Philosophy, Knowledge, Meaning and Truth, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
7. Widdoson, H.G. (1988, p. 98). Teaching Language as Communication. London: OUP
8. George Yule, (2000, p. 128) Pragmatics. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
9. Dixon, R.M (1964). On formal and contextual meaning. Acta Linguistica.
10. Walz, J. (1989). "Context and Contextualized Language Practice in Foreign Language Teaching".
11. The Modern Language Journal 73 (2): 160.
12. Firth. J. R. (1951). Papers in Linguistics, Oxford University Press.
13. Lyons, J. (1981, p.413). Language and Linguistics. CUP.
14. Charless, Walter. G. (2000, p.506-507). Contextual correlates of meaning. Applied psycholinguistics, 21 (04) 505.
15. Sulaimonova, D.A. (2019). Basic aspects of the formation of lexical skills of students of technical universities. Internationalscientificreview, (LXIV).
16. Xamzayevna, SulaymanovaDilnoza (2021)Web of Scientist: International Scientific Research Journal, Volume 2, Issue 5, P531-534
17. Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman
18. Сборник текстов информаций для бортпроводников, ВС ATR-72, РИ-200-15, Ташкент
19. Shohamy, Elana / Gorter, Durk (eds.) (2009): Linguistic Landscape. Expanding the Scenery. New York and London: Routledge
20. Dann, Graham M.S. (2003): "Noticing Notices: Tourism to Order", in: Annals of Tourism Research 30(2), 465-484
21. Abduraxmanova N.N. Using public transport (metro) in uzbek specific features of the instruction // Scientific aspects and trends in the fields of scientific research./ International scientific online conference. – Poland, Warsaw. 30 June, 2023. – P. 117-119.
22. Gorter, Durk (ed.) (2006): Linguistic Landscape. A New Approach to Multilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters
Copyright (c) 2025 «ACTA NUUz»
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
1.png)
