RETERMINOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT OF ECOLOGICAL TERMS IN ECONOMIC DISCOURSE (ON THE ANALISYS OF THE CONCEPTS “GREEN ECONOMY” AND “ECONOMIC RESOURCES”)
This article examines the process of reterminologization in ecological terminology from linguistic and cognitive perspectives.
Using the terms green economy and economic resources as case studies, the paper explores how ecological concepts enter economic
and political discourse and acquire new semantic and functional features. It is demonstrated that reterminologization occurs through
semantic expansion, abstraction, and the increasing use of terms in normative and applied contexts. The study employs discourse
analysis, comparative-semantic analysis, and a cognitive approach. The findings confirm the adaptability of the Uzbek
terminological system to interdisciplinary interaction and contemporary socio-economic needs. The results may contribute to the
systematic development of environmental and economic terminology.
1. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2030-yilgacha Oʻzbekiston Respublikasining “yashil” iqtisodiyotga oʻtishiga qaratilgan
islohotlar samaradorligini oshirish boʻyicha chora-tadbirlar toʻgʻrisida qarori, 02.12.2022 yildagi PQ-436-son https://lex.uz/ru/docs/-
6303230
2. Auger, Alain, and Caroline Barrière (eds.). 2008. “Pattern-based Approaches to Semantic Relation Extraction: A State-of-the-art.”
Terminology 14 (1): 1-19.
3. Cabré, M. T. (2003). Theories of Terminology: Their Description, Prescription and Explanation. Terminology, 9(2), 169–193.
4. Costanza, R. et al. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 387, pages 253–260
5. Discourse Analysis Oxford University Press, 2008 -172 p;
6. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books.
7. Hoffmann, L. (2021). * Kommunikationsmittel Fachsprache*. Berlin. De Gruyter 308-bet
8. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
9. Theo Van Leeuwen Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical
10. Toynbee, A. (1972) A Study of History. Oxford University Press, London, 321.
11. Temmerman, R. & Kerremans, K. (2003) Termontography: ontology building and the sociocognitive approach to terminology
description. Proceedings of CIL 17. 7. pp. 1-10.
12. Стеинин, И. A. (2001). Очерки по когнитивной лингвистике. — Воронеж, 2001
13. QUDRATOVA, M. (2025). THE LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATION OF TEMPORAL DEIXIS AND TIME MARKERS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK. «O‘zMU XABARLARI», 1(1.11.1), 268–271. https://doi.org/10.69617/nuuz.v1i1.11.1.9805
14. JUMAYEV, B. (2025). TARIXIY XOTIRANI SHAKLLANTIRISHDA TARIXIY SHAXSLAR MEROSIDAN FOYDALANISHNING AHAMIYATI. «O‘zMU XABARLARI», 1(1.11.1), 85–88. https://doi.org/10.69617/nuuz.v1i1.11.1.9804
15. JABBOROV, E. (2025). MILLIY MENTALITET VA YOSHLAR INFANTILIZMI. «O‘zMU XABARLARI», 1(1.11.1), 82–84. https://doi.org/10.69617/nuuz.v1i1.11.1.9803
16. KULDASHEVA, M. (2025). LUG‘AT TARKIBINING RIVOJLANISHIDA FRANSUZ ADSTRATIV IZLAR. «O‘zMU XABARLARI», 1(1.11.1), 265–267. https://doi.org/10.69617/nuuz.v1i1.11.1.9802
17. KARIMOVA, M. (2025). ASPEKTUAL SEMANTIKA VA FE’LLARNING HARAKAT TARZI: NAZARIY VA AMALIY JIHATLAR. «O‘zMU XABARLARI», 1(1.11.1), 262–264. https://doi.org/10.69617/nuuz.v1i1.11.1.9801
Copyright (c) 2026 «ACTA NUUz»
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
1.png)
