ISLOM TAFAKKURIDA SUNNAT INKORCHILIGI: TARIXIY ILDIZLAR, METODOLOGIK ASOSLAR VA ZAMONAVIY KO‘RINISHLAR
This article examines the historical roots, ideological foundations, and contemporary manifestations of movements that reject the Sunnah. It provides a scholarly analysis of the main claims advanced by the Kharijites, rationalist trends within the Mu‘tazilite school, and representatives of the Qur’aniyyun (Quranist) movement that emerged in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The study also explores the legal and methodological significance of the Sunnah based on the works of Sunni scholars and presents both textual and rational refutations of the doubts raised by its opponents. The article demonstrates that the Sunnah serves as a fundamental source that complements the Qur’an and facilitates its practical implementation, while also revealing the methodological weaknesses of contemporary Sunnah-denialist movements.
1. Goldziher, I. (1971). Muslim Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Al-Shafi’i, Muhammad ibn Idris. (2005). Al-Risala. Cairo: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyya.
3. Al-Ghazali, Muhammad. (1989). As-Sunna an-Nabawiyya bayna Ahl al-Fiqh wa Ahl al-Hadith. Beirut: Dar al-Shuruq.
4. Al-Maturidi, Abu Mansur. (2005). Ta’wilat Ahl al-Sunna. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyya.
5. Al-Shatibi, Ibrahim ibn Musa. (1997). Al-Muwafaqat fi Usul al-Sharia. Riyadh: Dar Ibn Affan.
6. Al-Khatib, Muhammad Ajjaj. (1989). Usul al-Hadith: Ulumuhu wa Mustalahuhu. Damascus: Dar al-Fikr.
7. As-Sibai, Mustafa. (1985). As-Sunna wa Makanatuha fi al-Tashri’ al-Islami. Beirut: Dar al-Warraq.
8. Abu Zahra, Muhammad. (1958). Usul al-Fiqh. Cairo: Dar al-Fikr al-Arabi.
9. Abu Rayya, Mahmud. (1958). Adwa’ ‘ala al-Sunna al-Muhammadiyya. Cairo: Dar al-Ma’arif.
10. Parwez, Ghulam Ahmad. (1950). Tulu-e-Islam. Lahore: Idara-e-Tulu-e-Islam.
Copyright (c) 2026 «ACTA NUUz»
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
1.png)
