THE DISCURSIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF ONOMASTIC TRANSFORMATION IN THE IDENTIFICATION OF LITERARY CHARACTERS
Downloads
The article examines onomastic transformation in English and Uzbek literary discourse with particular reference to character
identification and its discursive-pragmatic functions. Onomastic transformation is interpreted as the use of different naming forms
– personal names, surnames, pseudonyms, nicknames, titles and status markers – for the same referent within literary discourse.
The study draws on anthroponymic material from F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, Mark Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry
Finn, G‘afur G‘ulom’s Shum bola, Pirimqul Qodirov’s Yulduzli tunlar and Odil Yoqubov’s Ulug‘bek xazinasi. Contextual,
discourse-pragmatic, onomastic and comparative methods demonstrate that naming variants may remain referentially equivalent
while differing significantly in their pragmatic, social and evaluative functions. Changes in naming forms are shown to correlate
with social status, self-identification, interpersonal relations and narrative characterization
1. Debus F. Namen in literarischen Werken: (Er-)Findung – Form – Funktion. – Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2002.
2. Dvořáková Ž. Funkce vlastních jmen v literatuře a literární onomastika // Slovo a slovesnost. – 2012. – Roč. 73. – № 3. – S.
194–207.
3. Dvořáková Ž. Notes on functions of proper names in literature // Onoma. – 2018. – Vol. 53. – P. 33–48. – DOI:
10.34158/ONOMA.53/2018/3.
4. Суперанская А. В. Общая теория имени собственного. – М.: Наука, 1973. – 366 с.
5. Подольская Н. В. Словарь русской ономастической терминологии. – 2-е изд., перераб. и доп. – М.: Наука, 1988. –
192 с.
Copyright (c) 2026 «ACTA NUUz»

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




.jpg)

1.png)




