MUMTOZ VA ZAMONAVIY O‘ZBEK YOZUVCHILAR ASARLARIDA ERKAK VA AYOL YOZMA NUTQ MAKTUBLARI QO‘LLANISHINING LINGVOMADANIY, SEMANTIK VA PRAGMATIK XUSUSIYATLARI
This article analyzes the linguocultural, semantic, and pragmatic features of male and female written discourse expressed in the form of letters in selected works of classical and contemporary Uzbek literature. Particular attention is paid to the functions of letters in literary texts, including communication, plot development, character portrayal, the representation of social relations, and the transmission of cultural values. The differences between male and female letters are interpreted not as biological distinctions, but as phenomena shaped by the social roles constructed by the author, the historical context, communicative purpose, the relationship between the sender and the addressee, and prevailing cultural norms. The findings indicate that in classical literature, male written discourse is more frequently associated with social status, advice, political and moral content, whereas female written discourse tends to foreground personal experience, loyalty, separation, and family relationships. In contemporary literature, however, these boundaries have become relatively more flexible.
1. Altman J. G. Epistolarity: Approaches to a Form. – Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1982.
2. Austin J. L. How to Do Things with Words. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962.
3. Searle J. R. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.
4. Eckert P., McConnell-Ginet S. Language and Gender. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
5. Alisher Navoiy. Munshaot. – Toshkent: Fan.
6. Alisher Navoiy. Mukammal asarlar to‘plami. – Toshkent: Fan, 1987–2003.
7. Bobur Z. M. Boburnoma. – Toshkent: Sharq.
8. Qodiriy A. O‘tkan kunlar. – Toshkent: turli nashrlar.
9. Cho‘lpon. Kecha va kunduz. – Toshkent: turli nashrlar.
10. Oybek. Navoiy. – Toshkent: turli nashrlar.
11. Lakoff R. Language and Woman’s Place. – New York: Harper & Row, 1975.
12. Tannen D. Gender and Discourse. – New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
13. Brown P., Levinson S. C. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
14. Cameron D. The Myth of Mars and Venus: Do Men and Women Really Speak Different Languages? – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
15. Bakirova H. B. Formation of terminological competence in ESP education. JournalNX. A ultidisciplinary Peer Reviewed Journal, 6 (11), 63‒68 [Электронный ресурс].
Copyright (c) 2026 «ACTA NUUz»

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




.jpg)

1.png)




