PRAGMATIC AIMS OF LEGAL SPEECHES IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES
This article explores the pragmatic objectives of legal discourse in English and Uzbek. It provides real examples and analyzes them through contrastive discursive perspectives. The study focuses on speech acts, presuppositions, and cultural communicative strategies found in both languages, highlighting the importance of pragmatics for clarity and effectiveness in legal communication
1. Grice H.P. Logic and Conversation. In: Cole, P., Morgan, J.L. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press. 1975.
2. Searle J.R. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1979.
3. Ladyzhenskaya T.A., Fetisov N.E. Judicial Discourse: Issues of Pragmatics. Moscow: URSS. 2001.
4. Quronboyeva, G.A. (2020). Yuridik lingvistika asoslari. Toshkent: Innovatsiya.
5. Islomov A.S. Yuridik nutq terminologiyasi. Samarqand: SamDU Nashriyoti. 2022.
6. Shakirova M.S. Oʻzbek tilining nutqiy pragmatikasi. Toshkent: Fan. 2017
Copyright (c) 2025 «ACTA NUUz»
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
1.png)
