O‘ZBEK VA INGLIZ MEDIA-MATNLARIDA YURIDIK TERMINLARNING PRAGMATIK SALOHIYATI: ILLOKUTIV VA PERLOKUTIV ASPEKTLAR
This article provides a comparative study of the linguopragmatic nature of legal terms used in Uzbek and English media texts. The core research problem focuses on identifying the capacity of legal concepts within media discourse to exert socio-pragmatic impact on the reader's consciousness, extending beyond a purely informative function. The study employs speech acts theory, componential analysis, and comparative-typological methodology. The research findings indicate that legal terms in English media texts rely primarily on analytical illocutionary goals, whereas the Uzbek press emphasizes perlocutionary effects characterized by preventive and cautionary tones. The author's scientific contribution manifests in developing a pragmatic typologization model for legal linguistic sources based on Uzbek and English materials
1. Mirziyoyev Sh.M. Milliy taraqqiyot yo‘limizni qat’iyat bilan davom ettirib, yangi bosqichga ko‘taramiz. – Toshkent: “O‘zbekiston” NMIU, 2017. – B. 145.
2. Austin J.L. How to Do Things with Words. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962. – 168 p.
3. Searle J.R. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969. – 203 p.
4. Tiersma P. Legal Language. – Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999. – 326 p.
5. Bhatia V.K. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. – London: Longman, 1993. – 240 p.
6. Dadaboyev H. O‘zbek yuridik terminologiyasi. – Toshkent: “Yozuvchi”, 2000. – 120 b.
7. Usmonova O.R. Huquqiy diskursda yuridik terminlarning semantik tabiati // Ilmiy xabarnoma. – Toshkent, 2025. – №3. – B. 45-50.
8. Gibbons J. Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. – Blackwell Publishing, 2003. – 352 p.
9. Cao D. Translating Law. – Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 2007. – 189 p.
10. Azamatov S. Media matnlarining lingvopragmatik xususiyatlari // Filologiya masalalari. – Toshkent, 2024. – №2. – B. 78-83.
11. Cotterill J. Language and Power in Courtroom Discourse. – London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. – 256 p.
12. Toirova G. Pragmalingvistik tahlil metodologiyasi // O‘zbek tili va adabiyoti. – Toshkent, 2023. – №5. – B. 12-17.
13. Kurzon D. It is Hereby Performed: Legal Speech Acts. – Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1986. – 128 p.
14. Solan L.M. The Language of Judges. – Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993. – 224 p.
15. Ismoilov A. Yuridik publisistika tili va uslubi // Jurnalistika muammolari. – Toshkent, 2026. – №1. – B. 33-39.
Copyright (c) 2026 «ACTA NUUz»
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
1.png)
