LINGUISTIC ASPECTS OF METAPHOR AND METONYMY
The article addresses the issues related to the cognitive essence of metaphor and metonymy. The author gives a brief review of studies on metaphor and metonymy, stresses the continuity of different paradigms in the exploration of these phenomena, reveals the dynamic character of metaphorization and metonymization, points out and describes the common and differential features which help to distinguish these cognitive phenomena.
Fauconnier G., Turner M.Conceptual Integration Networks// Cognitive Science 1998. №22.P. 133–187.
Fludernik M., Freeman D.C., Freeman M.H.Metaphor and Beyond // Poetics Today 1999, 20. 3. P. 383–396. 3. KövecsesZ.Metonymy: Developing a Cognitive Linguistic View // Cognitive Linguistics 1998, #9-10. P. 37–77. 4. Lakoff, G., Women Fire and Dangerous Things.What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago and L.: The University ofChicago Press, 1987.
Panther K.U.Introduction: on the Nature of Conceptual Metonymy// Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins2003. P. 1–20.
PonterottoD.Metaphors We Can Learn by: How Insights from Cognitive Linguistic Research Can Improve the Teaching/Learning of Figurative Language // English Teaching Forum, vol. 32. Number 3. July 1994. P. 2–8. 7. Ruis de Mendoza IbáňezF.J.The Role of Mappings and Domains in Understanding Metonymy // Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: a Cognitive Perspective / Ed. by A. Barcelona. B. and N.Y.: Mouton de Gruyter, 2003. P. 109–132.
АлексееваЛ.М. Метафоры, которыемывы-бираем// Слюбовьюкязыку. М.; Воронеж: Во-ронеж. гос. ун-т, 2002. С. 288–298.
Аристотель Сочинения: в4 т. Т. 2. М.: Мысль, 1978.
Арутюнова Н.Д. Язык и мир человека. М.: Языки русской культуры, 1998.
Султанова Д. А. Роль изобразительно-выразительных средств в русском языке.// Ilm-ma’rifat nashriyoti, 2024.URL: https://scholar. google.ru/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=ru&user=LhpU0foAAAAJ&citation_for_view=LhpU0foAAAAJ:W7OEmFMy1 HYC
.jpg)
1.png)
