ВЫЯВЛЕНИЕ ПРИЧИННЫХ СВЯЗЕЙ В ПРОБЛЕМНЫХ ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИХ СИТУАЦИЯХ: МЕТОДИКА ОБУЧЕНИЯ ВЫДВИЖЕНИЮ И ПРОВЕРКЕ АЛЬТЕРНАТИВНЫХ ГИПОТЕЗ
В статье разработана методика обучения причинному анализу педагогических ситуаций. Цель связать альтернативные гипотезы, различающие их данные и решения педагога. Применены анализ литературы, концептуальный синтез и дидактическое моделирование. Предложены семиэтапный цикл, матрица проверки гипотез и рубрика из шести критериев. Методика теоретически обоснована; её эффективность требует эмпирической проверки.
1. Lederer A., Thomm E., Bauer J. (2024). Preservice teachers’ evaluation of evidential support in causal arguments about
educational topics. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1379222. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1379222
2. Bauer E., Sailer M., Kiesewetter J., Fischer M. R., Fischer F. (2022). Diagnostic argumentation in teacher education: Making
the case for justification, disconfirmation, and transparency. Frontiers in Education, 7, 977631.
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.977631
3. Fischer F., Kollar I., Ufer S. et al. (2014). Scientific Reasoning and Argumentation: Advancing an Interdisciplinary Research
Agenda in Education. Frontline Learning Research, 2(3), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i2.96
4. Kuhn D., Iordanou K., Pease M., Wirkala C. (2008). Beyond control of variables: What needs to develop to achieve skilled
scientific thinking? Cognitive Development, 23(4), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.006
5. Hernán M. A., Robins J. M. (2020). Causal Inference: What If. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC. Mualliflarning ochiq
elektron nashri. https://miguelhernan.org/whatifbook
6. Pedaste M., Mäeots M., Siiman L. A. et al. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle.
Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
7. Lazonder A. W., Harmsen R. (2016). Meta-Analysis of Inquiry-Based Learning: Effects of Guidance. Review of Educational
Research, 86(3), 681–718. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366
8. Heitzmann N., Seidel T., Opitz A. et al. (2019). Facilitating diagnostic competences in simulations: A conceptual framework
and a research agenda for medical and teacher education. Frontline Learning Research, 7(4), 1–24.
https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v7i4.384
9. Bichler S., Sailer M., Bauer E. et al. (2024). Promoting diagnostic reasoning in teacher education: the role of case format and
perceived authenticity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39, 3227–3252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-
00874-x
10. Hartmann U., Kindlinger M., Trempler K., Molitor A.-L., Fives H. (2025). Reflecting on teaching together and alone:
preservice teachers’ processes of knowledge construction in writing and discussion. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1668962.
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1668962
11. Knogler M., Böheim R., Diery A., Harackiewicz J., Seidel T. (2025). Promoting positive beliefs toward research evidence:
results from a utility-value intervention study with pre-service teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1391931.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1391931
12. British Educational Research Association (2024). Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. 5th ed. London: BERA.
https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-fifth-edition-2024
Copyright (c) 2026 «ВЕСТНИК НУУз»
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование — На тех же условиях») 4.0 Всемирная.
.jpg)
2.png)
