MUAMMOLI PEDAGOGIK VAZIYATLARDA SABABIY BOG‘LANISHLARNI ANIQLASH: MUQOBIL FARAZLARNI ILGARI SURISH VA TEKSHIRISHGA O‘RGATISH METODIKASI
##submission.downloads##
Maqolada pedagogik vaziyatlarni sababiy tahlil qilishga o‘rgatish metodikasi ishlab chiqiladi. Maqsad muqobil faraz, farqlovchi dalil va pedagogik qarorni yagona tizimda bog‘lash. Maqsadli adabiyotlar tahlili, konseptual sintez va didaktik modellashtirish qo‘llanildi. Yetti bosqichli sikl, farazlarni tekshirish matritsasi va olti mezonli rubrika taklif etildi. Metodika nazariy asoslandi; uning samaradorligi keyingi empirik tekshiruvni talab etadi.
1. Lederer A., Thomm E., Bauer J. (2024). Preservice teachers’ evaluation of evidential support in causal arguments about
educational topics. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1379222. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1379222
2. Bauer E., Sailer M., Kiesewetter J., Fischer M. R., Fischer F. (2022). Diagnostic argumentation in teacher education: Making
the case for justification, disconfirmation, and transparency. Frontiers in Education, 7, 977631.
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.977631
3. Fischer F., Kollar I., Ufer S. et al. (2014). Scientific Reasoning and Argumentation: Advancing an Interdisciplinary Research
Agenda in Education. Frontline Learning Research, 2(3), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i2.96
4. Kuhn D., Iordanou K., Pease M., Wirkala C. (2008). Beyond control of variables: What needs to develop to achieve skilled
scientific thinking? Cognitive Development, 23(4), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.006
5. Hernán M. A., Robins J. M. (2020). Causal Inference: What If. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC. Mualliflarning ochiq
elektron nashri. https://miguelhernan.org/whatifbook
6. Pedaste M., Mäeots M., Siiman L. A. et al. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle.
Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
7. Lazonder A. W., Harmsen R. (2016). Meta-Analysis of Inquiry-Based Learning: Effects of Guidance. Review of Educational
Research, 86(3), 681–718. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366
8. Heitzmann N., Seidel T., Opitz A. et al. (2019). Facilitating diagnostic competences in simulations: A conceptual framework
and a research agenda for medical and teacher education. Frontline Learning Research, 7(4), 1–24.
https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v7i4.384
9. Bichler S., Sailer M., Bauer E. et al. (2024). Promoting diagnostic reasoning in teacher education: the role of case format and
perceived authenticity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39, 3227–3252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-
00874-x
10. Hartmann U., Kindlinger M., Trempler K., Molitor A.-L., Fives H. (2025). Reflecting on teaching together and alone:
preservice teachers’ processes of knowledge construction in writing and discussion. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1668962.
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1668962
11. Knogler M., Böheim R., Diery A., Harackiewicz J., Seidel T. (2025). Promoting positive beliefs toward research evidence:
results from a utility-value intervention study with pre-service teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1391931.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1391931
12. British Educational Research Association (2024). Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. 5th ed. London: BERA.
https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-fifth-edition-2024
Mulkiiyat (c) 2026 «O‘zMU XABARLARI»
Ushbu ish quyidagi litsenziya asosida ruxsatlangan Kreativ Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International litsenziyasi asosida bu ish ruxsatlangan..
.jpg)
.png)
