IMPROVING THE METHODOLOGY OF DEVELOPING THE BASIC CONCEPTS OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF FUTURE TEACHERS
Each curriculum developed in higher education institutions should not only serve as a necessary basis for the education of graduates, but should also be able to give them the qualities of discipline. Disciplinary literacies used in the fields of natural sciences serve for the development of key competencies aimed at the progression of education. The units that make up the concept of literacy in the field of molecular biology are: critical thinking, self-management, communication, information literacy, visual literacy, practical skills, and content knowledge. All of these create a connected metaliteracy that supports the use of evidence-based, robust learning methods.
Aqida VALIXANOVA. (2025). IMPROVING THE METHODOLOGY OF DEVELOPING THE BASIC CONCEPTS OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF FUTURE TEACHERS. «ВЕСТНИК НУУз», 1(1.1), 71–73. https://doi.org/10.69617/nuuz.v1i1.1.6174
Научный метод познания как основа формирования научного типа мышления у обучающихся 8 класса на уроках биологии;
2. Reychel Boulay, Aleks Pariski, Kris Kempbell “Developing teachers understanding of molecular biology: Building a foundation for students”, NIH Public Access 2011;
3. Momsen JL,Long TM, Wyse SA and Ebert-May D “Just the facts? Introductory undergraduate biology courses focus on low-level cognitive skills”. CBE Life S.Educ, 2010, 435–440;
4. Evers T “Literacy in all Subjects”. 2015;
5. Ventura M, Lai E, and Dicerbo K “Skills for Today: What We Know about Teaching and Assessing Critical Thinking”. 2017;
6. Mulnix JW “Thinking critically about critical thinking”. Educ Philos Theory 44,2012, pp 464–479;
7. Schönborn KJ and Anderson TR “Bridging the educational research-teaching practice gap: foundations for assessing and developing biochemistry students' visual literacy”. Biochem Mol Biol Educ 38, 2010. pp 347–354.
8. Van Gelder T “Teaching critical thinking: some lessons from cognitive science”. College Teach 53, 2005 pp 41–48;
9. Ennis RH “Critical thinking and subject specificity: clarification and needed research”. Educ Research18, 2007 pp4–10;
10. Valixanova A. “Molekulyar biologiya va biotexnologiya mavzularini o‘qitishda innovatsion texnologiyalardan foydalanish”. “Aniq va tabiiy fanlarni o‘qitishda zamonaviy yondashuv: Muammo va yechimlar: mavzusida xalqaro ilmiy-amaliy konferensiya materiallari. Termiz 2023.
2. Reychel Boulay, Aleks Pariski, Kris Kempbell “Developing teachers understanding of molecular biology: Building a foundation for students”, NIH Public Access 2011;
3. Momsen JL,Long TM, Wyse SA and Ebert-May D “Just the facts? Introductory undergraduate biology courses focus on low-level cognitive skills”. CBE Life S.Educ, 2010, 435–440;
4. Evers T “Literacy in all Subjects”. 2015;
5. Ventura M, Lai E, and Dicerbo K “Skills for Today: What We Know about Teaching and Assessing Critical Thinking”. 2017;
6. Mulnix JW “Thinking critically about critical thinking”. Educ Philos Theory 44,2012, pp 464–479;
7. Schönborn KJ and Anderson TR “Bridging the educational research-teaching practice gap: foundations for assessing and developing biochemistry students' visual literacy”. Biochem Mol Biol Educ 38, 2010. pp 347–354.
8. Van Gelder T “Teaching critical thinking: some lessons from cognitive science”. College Teach 53, 2005 pp 41–48;
9. Ennis RH “Critical thinking and subject specificity: clarification and needed research”. Educ Research18, 2007 pp4–10;
10. Valixanova A. “Molekulyar biologiya va biotexnologiya mavzularini o‘qitishda innovatsion texnologiyalardan foydalanish”. “Aniq va tabiiy fanlarni o‘qitishda zamonaviy yondashuv: Muammo va yechimlar: mavzusida xalqaro ilmiy-amaliy konferensiya materiallari. Termiz 2023.
.jpg)
2.png)
