ONLAYN PLATFORMALAR ORQALI KITOBXONLAR INTERPRETATSIYASINI TAHLIL QILISH TAMOYILLARI
##submission.downloads##
Ushbu maqolada onlayn platformalarda kitobxonlar tomonidan yaratilayotgan sharhlar, fikrlar, izohlar va o‘zaro muhokamalarni tahlil qilish tamoyillari yoritiladi. Tadqiqot digital ijtimoiy o‘qish (DSR), Retseptiv poetikanazariyasi, foydalanuvchi yaratgan kontentni kompyuter lingvistikasi asosida qayta ishlash va onlayn izohlarning semantik, affektiv hamda narrativ xususiyatlarini aniqlashga asoslanadi. Maqolada Goodreads, Wattpad, onlayn yangilik platformalari kabi maydonlarda shakllanadigan o‘quvchi tajribalarining strukturalashuvi, interpretativ jamoalarning shakllanishi, izohlarning emotsional dinamikasi va ularni tahlil qilishning kompyuterlashtirilgan usullari chuqur tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqot natijasida kitobxon talqinlarini o‘rganishda kontent-analiz, diskurs tahlili, sentiment-analiz, narrativ tarmoq modellari va chuqur o‘rganishga asoslangan klassifikatsiya metodlarining samaradorligi asoslab beriladi.
1. Cordón-García J. A. and Gómez-Díaz R. (eds.) (2019). Lectura, Sociedad y Redes. Colaboración, Visibilidad y Recomendación En El Ecosistema Del Libro. Madrid: Marcial Pons.
2. Cordón-García J.-A. et al. (2013). Social Reading. Oxford: Chandos.
3. Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? Cambridge: Harvard UP.
4. Holur, Pavan; Shahsavari, Shadi; Ebrahimzadeh, Ehsan; Tangherlini, Timothy R.; Roychowdhury, Vwani (2021). Supplementary material from "Modelling social readers: novel tools for addressing reception from online book reviews". The Royal Society. Collection. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5754141.v1
5. Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins UP.
6. Karolides, N. (1992). Reader-response in the classroom. In N. Karolides (Ed.). The transactional theory of literature (pp. 21-32). NY: Longman.
7. Leveratto J.-M., Leontsini M. (2008). Internet et la sociabilité littéraire. Éditions de la Bibliothèque publique d’information. doi:10.4000/books.bibpompidou.197.
8. Montesi M. (2015). La lectura en las redes sociales: posibilidades de análisis para el investigador. Revista Ibero-Americana de ciencia da informacao, 8(1): 67–81.
9. Pianzola F. et al. (2019). Digital Social Reading Public Bibliography. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3525468.
10. Pianzola F., Rebora S., Lauer G. (2020). Wattpad as a resource for literary studies. Quantitative and qualitative examples of the importance of digital social reading and readers’ comments in the margins. PLoS One, 15(1). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226708
11. Rehfeldt M. (2017). Leserrezensionen als Rezeptionsdokumente. Zum Nutzen nicht-professioneller Literaturkritiken Für Die Literaturwissenschaft. In Bartl A. and Behmer M. (eds.), Die Rezension. Aktuelle Tendenzen Der Literaturkritik. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, pp. 275–89.
12. Rosenblatt, L. (1983). Literature as exploration (4th ed.). NY: MLA.
13. Rosenblatt, L. (2002). Literary theory. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, J. Squire, and J. Jensen (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teaching the English Language Arts (pp. 67-73). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mulkiiyat (c) 2025 «O‘zMU XABARLARI»
Ushbu ish quyidagi litsenziya asosida ruxsatlangan Kreativ Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International litsenziyasi asosida bu ish ruxsatlangan..
.jpg)
.png)
