COGNITIVE AND METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES OF THE WRITING PROCESS
This article examines the theoretical foundations of writing strategies and their effectiveness in developing writing skills in a foreign
language, particularly in English. The article also provides a detailed discussion of the concept of metacognition and its main
components – declarative, procedural, and conditional knowledge. In addition, the importance of cognitive processes in education
is demonstrated through Bloom’s taxonomy and its revised model. The findings suggest that employing instructional methods
based on cognitive and metacognitive approaches significantly enhances the quality of learners’ written performance in a foreign
language.
1. Riazi, A. Acquiring disciplinary literacy: A social-cognitive analysis of text production and learning among Iranian graduate students of
education // Journal of Second Language Writing. – 1997. – Vol. 6, № 2. – P. 105–137.
2. Olivares-Cuhat, G. Learning strategies and achievement in the Spanish writing classroom: A case study // Foreign Language Annals. – 2002.
– Vol. 35, № 5. – P. 561–570.
3. Aziz, L. A model of paired cognitive and metacognitive strategies: Its effect on second language grammar and writing performance : PhD
diss. – San Francisco : University of San Francisco, 1995.
4. Mu, C., Carrington, S. An investigation of three Chinese students’ English writing strategies // TESL-EJ. – 2007. – Vol. 11, № 1. – P. 1–23.
5. Cook, V. Second language learning and language teaching. – London : Hodder Education, 2008.
6. Mu, C., Carrington, S. An investigation of three Chinese students’ English writing strategies // TESL-EJ. – 2007. – Vol. 11, № 1. – P. 1–23.
7. Oxford, R. L. Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. – New York : Heinle & Heinle Publishers, 1990.
8. Goctu, R. Metacognitive strategies in academic writing // Journal of Education in Black Sea Region. – 2017. – Vol. 2, № 2. – P. 82–96. –
DOI: 10.31578/jebs.v2i2.44.
9. Гальскова Н. Д., Гез Н. И. Теория обучения иностранным языкам. Лингводидактика и методика : учеб. пособие для студ. лингв.
ун-тов и фак. ин. яз. высш. пед. учеб. заведений. – 3-е изд., стер. – М. : Академия, 2006. – С. 115.
10. Гальскова Н. Д., Гез Н. И. Теория обучения иностранным языкам. Лингводидактика и методика : учеб. пособие. – 3-е изд., стер. –
М. : Академия, 2006. – С. 118.
11. Loarer, E., Yuto, M. Когнитивное обучение: история и методы // Когнитивное обучение: современное состояние и перспективы /
под ред. Т. Галкиной, Э. Лоарера. – М. : Институт психологии РАН, 1997. – С. 17–33.
12. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., Krathwohl, D. R. Taxonomy of educational objectives. – Vol. 2. – New York :
Longmans, Green, 1964.
13. Flavell, J. H. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry // American Psychologist. – 1979. –
Vol. 34. – P. 906–911. – DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906.
14. Hacker, D. J., Keener, M. C., Kircher, J. C. Writing is applied metacognition // Metacognition in education / ed. by D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky,
A. C. Graesser. – New Jersey : Routledge, 2009. – P. 154–172.
15. Flavell, J. H. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry // American Psychologist. – 1979. –
Vol. 34. – P. 906–911. – DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906.
16. Meichenbaum, D., Biemiller, A. Nurturing independent learners: Helping students take charge of their learning. – Cambridge, MA :
Brookline Books, 1998.
17. Fogarty, R. How to teach for metacognitive reflection. – Glenview, IL : Pearson SkyLight, 1994.
18. Woolfolk, A. Educational psychology. – 9th ed. – Boston : Allyn and Bacon, 2008.
19. Flavell, J. H. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry // American Psychologist. – 1979. –
Vol. 34. – P. 906–911. – DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906.
20. Schraw, G., Dennison, R. S. Assessing metacognitive awareness // Contemporary Educational Psychology. – 1994. – Vol. 19, № 4. – P.
460–475.
21. MUSTAFAYEVA, N. (2025). CHET TIL O‘QITISHDA BLUM TAKSONOMIYASINI INTEGRATSIYA QILISH TAMOYILLARI. «O‘zMU XABARLARI», 1(11), 127–129. https://doi.org/10.69617/nuuz.v1i11.9715
22. MIRZARAXIMOV, B. (2025). TURIZM FENOMENI VA UMUMBASHARIY QADRIYATLAR TRANSFORMATSIYASINING AKSIOLOGIK TAHLILI. «O‘zMU XABARLARI», 1(11), 123–126. https://doi.org/10.69617/nuuz.v1i11.9714
23. MAHMUDOVA, S. (2025). TALABALARNING LINGVO-METODIK TAFAKKURINI RIVOJLANTIRISHNING O’ZIGA XOS ASPEKTLARI. «O‘zMU XABARLARI», 1(11), 120–122. https://doi.org/10.69617/nuuz.v1i11.9713
24. MAMATOV, M. (2025). MUSTAQIL RIVOJLANISH JARAYONIDA MA’NAVIY HAYOT VA BARKAMOL AVLODNI TARBIYALASHNING O‘ZIGA XOS JIHATLARI. «O‘zMU XABARLARI», 1(11), 117–119. https://doi.org/10.69617/nuuz.v1i11.9712
25. MIRZAAXMEDOV, M. (2025). ANAPHORIC DEPENDENCIES IN KOREAN AND UZBEK. «O‘zMU XABARLARI», 1(11), 255–257. https://doi.org/10.69617/nuuz.v1i11.9708
Copyright (c) 2026 «ACTA NUUz»
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
1.png)
