TIL TA’LIMIDA O‘QITUVCHILARNING KASBIY RAQAMLI KOMPETENSIYASI: DASTURLAR ASOSIDAGI TAHLILIY SINTEZ
##submission.downloads##
Ta’limning raqamli transformatsiyasi o‘qituvchilardan keng qamrovli kasbiy raqamli kompetensiyani (KRK) namoyon etishni talab
etmoqda. Ushbu tahliliy sharh KRK tushunchasini til ta’limi kontekstida aniqlash va amaliyotga tatbiq etish maqsadida yigirmadan
ortiq ilmiy va siyosiy manbalarni umumlashtiradi. Tadqiqot DigCompEdu, TPACK, ISTE, digi.kompP hamda DC4LT, Cambridge
va EAQUALS kabi maxsus dasturlarni nazariy asoslari, empirik dalillari va siyosiy ahamiyati bo‘yicha taqqosladi. Natijalar
raqamli resurslar, pedagogik integratsiya va baholash kabi umumiy kompetensiyalarni ko‘rsatdi, biroq amaliy qo‘llashda
kontekstual tafovutlarni aniqladi. Tadqiqot SI savodxonligi, ma’lumotlar xavfsizligi va tanqidiy raqamli pedagogikani
integratsiyalashni taklif etadi.
1. Amilusholihah, L. (2024). Contextualizing TPACK in EFL Teacher Education. Journal of Digital Pedagogies, 12(2), 165–
172.
2. Brandhofer, G., & Miglbauer, M. (2020). Digi.kompP Framework and Teacher Competence Progression in Austria. Vienna:
Austrian Ministry of Education, pp. 1–85.
3. Crompton, H. (2023). Implementing ISTE Standards in Teacher Education. Computers & Education, 189, 104602.
4. Fabian, K., et al. (2024). TPACK-Based Professional Development: A Meta-Analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 136,
104482.
5. Frontiers. (2024). Professional Digital Competence in Higher Education. Frontiers in Education, 9, 115–124.
6. Ghomi, M. (2019). Professional Digital Competence in Teacher Education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,
63(2), 159–182.
7. Hammoda, M. (2022). The Digital Competence Framework for Learners (DCFL). Educational Technology Research, 68(3),
40–55.
8. INTEF. (2022). Spanish Framework for the Digital Competence of Teachers (SFDCT). Madrid: Ministry of Education, pp.
1–60.
9. ISTE. (2025). ISTE Standards for Educators. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education, pp. 1–75.
10. Johannesen, M., Norhagen, S., & Lund, A. (2024). Empirical Applications of TPACK and DigCompEdu. International
Journal of Educational Research, 124, 102087.
11. Michaeli, T., et al. (2020). Evaluating the ISTE Standards Implementation. Journal of Online Learning Research, 6(2), 10–
15.
12. Mucundanyi, G. (2022). Teacher Self-Efficacy and ISTE Framework Adoption. International Journal of Educational
Technology, 12(4), 430–440.
13. OECD. (2023). Digital Education Outlook 2023: Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age. Paris: OECD Publishing, pp. 1–
220.
14. Parra, J., Raynor, C., Osanloo, A., et al. (2019). (Re)Imagining an Undergraduate Integrating Technology with Teaching
Course. TechTrends, 63(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0362-x
15. Perifanou, M. (2021). Digital Competence Assessment Framework and Tool for Language Teachers. DC4LT Consortium.
16. Perifanou, M. (2022). DC4LT Assessment Framework for Language Teachers. ReCALL, 34(1), 12–20.
17. Redecker, C. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Luxembourg: Joint
Research Centre, European Commission, pp. 1–80.
18. Shakotko, T. (2025). Assessment Strategies for Digital Competence. Language Learning & Technology, 29(1), 12–18.
19. WeVideo. (2024). Applying the ISTE Analyst Standard in Digital Feedback. Educational Technology Review, 45(3).
Mulkiiyat (c) 2025 «O‘zMU XABARLARI»
Ushbu ish quyidagi litsenziya asosida ruxsatlangan Kreativ Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International litsenziyasi asosida bu ish ruxsatlangan..
.jpg)
.png)
