LEXICAL-SEMANTIC FIELD OF THE WORDS DENOTING “NATURAL DISASTERS” IN ENGLISH
Abstract
The study aimed to demonstrate the structure of the lexico-semantic field “Natural Disasters” by the material of the English language. In addition to identifying certain groups, subgroups, and sub-subgroups within the topic under investigation, also the article takes into account different kinds of semantic relations within it. The scientific superiority of the article stems from the fact that it was the first to organize disaster vocabulary units using a field technique. The results of the findings revealed that the lexico-semantic field of the words denoting “Natural Disasters” contains multiple lexico-semantic groupings. Aspects such as synonymy, antonymy, hypo-hyperonymic, and part-whole relations are examples of paradigmatic relationships between lexemes that are shown in the classification scheme. These relationships highlight the organizational complexity and hierarchical structure of the studied field.
References
2. Pamela Faber, Miriam Buendía Castro. Lexicography for Specialised Languages, Technology and Terminography. EcoLexicon // Proceedings of the XVI EURALEX International Congress: The User in Focus, 2014.
3. Петерс Л. П., Филатова Н. И. К вопросу о лексико-семантическом поле «Пища» в испанском языке // Университетские чтения - 2015: мат. науч.-метод. чтений ПГЛУ. Пятигорск: Изд-во Пятигорского государственного лингвистического университета, 2015.
4. Adrienne Lehrer. Semantic fields and lexical structure. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1974 – P 1.
5. Кобозева И. М. Лингвистическая семантика. М.: Эдиториал УРСС, 2000 – С 99.
6. John Lyons. Structural Semantics: An Analysis of Part of the Vocabulary of Plato. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, the Society, 1963 – P 67.
7. Васильев Л. М. Обзоры теория семантических полей // Вопросы языкознания, 1971 – С 110.
8. Филин Ф. П. О лексико-семантических группах слов // Очерки по теории языкознания. 1982. № 8.
9. Караулов Ю. Н. Общая и русская идеография. М.: Наука, 1976 – С 6;314.
10. Эгамназаров Х. Х. О понятии лексико-семантического поля в лингвистике // Ученые записки Худжандского государственного университета им. академика Б. Гафурова. Гуманитарные науки. 2018. № 1 (54) – С 186.
11. Медведева Н. А. Анализ лексико-семантической группы слов (композитов) с общим компонентом «фитнес» // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. 2017. № 10-2 (76).
12. Popova O.A., Gracheva N.G., Pepelyaeva Y.A. Russian as a foreign language: an analysis of the lexical-thematic group "health" // Russian Linguistic Bulletin. 2023. № 10(46)
13. Balandina E.S, Al-Abbodi M.F. Linguistic representation of natural disasters in media coverage // Bulletin of the South Ural Stcate University. Ser. Linguistics. 2020. № 2 (17) – p 30-35.
14. Shinya Uekusa, Disaster linguicism: Linguistic minorities in disasters, Language in Society 48:3, 2019 – p 353-375.
15. Sungdo Kim. Semiotics of natural disaster discourse in post-tsunami world: A theoretical framework // Sign Systems Studies. 2006. № 1(34).
16. Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries. URL: https://oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com
17. Cambridge English Dictionary. URL: https://dictionary.cambridge.org
18. Merriam-Webster Dictionary. URL: https://www.merriam-webster.com
.jpg)
1.png)
This work is licensed under a 